Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- philipp-norton [2019/02/26 22:51]
group created
+++ philipp-norton [2020/03/09 15:25]
philipp Add paper and DOIs
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ~~NOTOC~~
+{{ :grouppicture_2019_-_1.jpg?nolink&800|}}
+\\
+\\
+\\
@@ Line 23: / Line 29: @@
 \\
+Norton P, Barschke P, Scharff C, Mendoza E (2019): **Differential Song Deficits after Lentivirus-Mediated Knockdown of FoxP1, FoxP2, or FoxP4 in Area X of Juvenile Zebra Finches**, //Journal of Neuroscience//, 39(49), 9782-9796. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1250-19.2019\\
-Burchardt L S, Norton P, Behr O, Scharff C, Knörnschild M (2019): **General isochronous rhythm in echolocation calls and social vocalizations of the bat Saccopteryx bilineata.**, Royal Society Open Science, 6(181076).\\
+Burchardt L S, Norton P, Behr O, Scharff C, Knörnschild M (2019): **General isochronous rhythm in echolocation calls and social vocalizations of the bat Saccopteryx bilineata.**, //Royal Society Open Science//, 6(181076). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181076\\
-Ravignani A*, Norton P* (2017): **Measuring rhythmic complexity: A primer to quantify and compare temporal structure in speech, movement, and animal vocalizations.**, Journal of Language Evolution, 2(1), 4–19.\\ *The authors contributed equally to this study \\
+Ravignani A*, Norton P* (2017): **Measuring rhythmic complexity: A primer to quantify and compare temporal structure in speech, movement, and animal vocalizations.**, //Journal of Language Evolution//, 2(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzx002 *The authors contributed equally to this study\\
-Norton P, Scharff C (2016): **“Bird Song Metronomics“: Isochronous Organization of Zebra Finch Song Rhythm.**, Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10(309).\\
+Norton P, Scharff C (2016): **“Bird Song Metronomics“: Isochronous Organization of Zebra Finch Song Rhythm.**, //Frontiers in Neuroscience//, 10(309). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00309\\
-Ullrich R, Norton P, Scharff C (2016): **Waltzing Taeniopygia: integration of courtship song and dance in the Australian zebra finch.**, Animal Behaviour, 112, 285–300.\\
+Ullrich R, Norton P, Scharff C (2016): **Waltzing Taeniopygia: integration of courtship song and dance in the Australian zebra finch.**, //Animal Behaviour//, 112, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.11.012\\
-Degen J, Kirbach A, Reiter L, Lehmann K, Norton P, Storms M, Koblofsky M, Winter S, Georgieva P B, Nguyen H, Chamkhi H, Meyer H, Singh P K, Manz G, Greggers U, Menzel R (2016): **Honeybees Learn Landscape Features during Exploratory Orientation Flights.**, Current Biology, 26(20), 1–5.\\
+Degen J, Kirbach A, Reiter L, Lehmann K, Norton P, Storms M, Koblofsky M, Winter S, Georgieva P B, Nguyen H, Chamkhi H, Meyer H, Singh P K, Manz G, Greggers U, Menzel R (2016): **Honeybees Learn Landscape Features during Exploratory Orientation Flights.**, //Current Biology//, 26(20), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.013\\
-Degen J, Kirbach A, Reiter L, Lehmann K, Norton P, Storms M, Koblofsky M, Winter S, Georgieva P B, Nguyen H, Chamkhi H, Greggers U, Menzel R (2015): **Exploratory behaviour of honeybees during orientation flights.**, Animal Behaviour, 102, 45–57.\\
+Degen J, Kirbach A, Reiter L, Lehmann K, Norton P, Storms M, Koblofsky M, Winter S, Georgieva P B, Nguyen H, Chamkhi H, Greggers U, Menzel R (2015): **Exploratory behaviour of honeybees during orientation flights.**, //Animal Behaviour//, 102, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.030\\
-Menzel R, Kirbach A, Haass W D, Fischer B, Fuchs J, Koblofsky M, Lehmann K, Reiter L, Meyer H, Nguyen H, Jones S, Norton P, Greggers U (2011): **A common frame of reference for learned and communicated vectors in honeybee navigation.**, Current Biology, 21(8), 645–650.
+Menzel R, Kirbach A, Haass W D, Fischer B, Fuchs J, Koblofsky M, Lehmann K, Reiter L, Meyer H, Nguyen H, Jones S, Norton P, Greggers U (2011): **A common frame of reference for learned and communicated vectors in honeybee navigation.**, //Current Biology//, 21(8), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.039